Top AI builders in Healthcare & Life Sciences
Builders never pay to be listed, and order never depends on fees. What counts
On this page: Rankings · New this month · By model
Rankings
Top builders
- 1CorralDataTop use case: Marketing spend optimized on the wrong signal4solutions · 3 complete
- 2Ideas2IT TechnologiesTop use case: Legacy code or system migrated by hand3solutions
- 3OmnificityTop use case: Acquired or multi-entity units that report separately3solutions
- 4OutcomeCatalystTop use case: Revenue leaking in handoffs nobody can see2solutions · 1 complete
- 5WallabiTop use case: Engineering throughput capped by hands-on-keyboard hours2solutions · 1 complete
- 6PressWTop use case: Unstructured documents hold answers nobody can search2solutions
- 7Impact AdvisorsTop use case: AI adoption blocked or ungoverned2solutions
- 8Bonsai LabsTop use case: Hiring throughput capped by screening and scheduling2solutions
- 9The AI LabTop use case: Quality depends on which site or which person2solutions
- 10TarsTop use case: Marketing1solution · 1 complete
- 11ModernEdge AITop use case: Per-session admin out of billable or clinical time1solution · 1 complete
- 12RAM SolutionsTop use case: Document reviewed against rules before it can move1solution · 1 complete
- 13Bolt GroupTop use case: Missed or slow inbound calls at a multi-site service business1solution · 1 complete
- 14ScrumLaunchTop use case: Unstructured documents hold answers nobody can search1solution · 1 complete
- 15BlueLabelTop use case: Inbound inquiries that need a knowledgeable answer1solution · 1 complete
- 16Boxcar aiTop use case: Quality depends on which site or which person1solution
- 17North GroupTop use case: AI tools in place but unconfigured for the work1solution
- 18TopsailTop use case: Quote or bid that needs engineering or pricing judgment1solution
- 19Dewey LabsTop use case: Repeat customer questions that eat support capacity1solution
- 20Stoop StudiosTop use case: Document reviewed against rules before it can move1solution
Ranked by solutions on file. Ties go to the builder with more complete receipts: ones that say what changed in numbers, how long it took and what it cost. Once enough receipts are complete, this board will rank by those instead.
On file: 10 more builders
- Tensile1 solution
- Ode1 solution
- BOI (Board of Innovation)1 solution
- DevDash Labs1 solution
- Teneo.ai1 solution
- Switchboard1 solution
- Next Focus1 solution
- Dextra Labs1 solution
- Lazer Technologies1 solution
- Artium AI1 solution
Buyers' picks
- 1
- 2How a Pharma Team Cut Disclosure Prep to 10 MinutesRAM Solutions
- 3
- 4How a 10-Agency Home-Care Network Cut Admin WorkModernEdge AI
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Likes from buyers count first. Until more solutions have likes, the rest of the list is the receipts that tell a buyer the most: outcomes, a number, a time and a cost.
New this month
By model
Pick a model to see who builds on it and what for.
18 solutions use several models; 18 run on custom or proprietary models. A solution counts once for each family it names. GPT includes OpenAI, ChatGPT and Azure OpenAI; Gemini includes NotebookLM; Open-weight is Llama, Mistral and other self-hosted models.
Most solutions on any model
- 1ModernEdge AITop use case: Repeat customer questions that eat support capacity15solutions
- 2CorralDataTop use case: Marketing spend optimized on the wrong signal10solutions
- 3ElizaTop use case: Engineering throughput capped by hands-on-keyboard hours9solutions
- 4OdeTop use case: Intake documents retyped into a system9solutions
- 5PressWTop use case: Policies exist but nobody can find them mid-task9solutions
- 6Lazer TechnologiesTop use case: Validation and prototyping that takes months before a real user sees it8solutions
- 7Bolt GroupTop use case: Staff or capacity scheduled without visibility into volume6solutions
- 8North GroupTop use case: AI tools in place but unconfigured for the work6solutions
What it's used for
- 116solutions
- 215solutions
- 312solutions
- 411solutions
- 510solutions
- 610solutions
Share of new solutions, by quarter
| Quarter | GPT | Claude | Gemini | Other | Open-weight | Solutions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 61% | 40% | 12% | 7% | 1% | 92 |
| 2026 Q3 | 43% | 44% | 12% | 9% | 5% | 104 |
| 2026 Q4 | 25% | 75% | 17% | 21% | 8% | 24 |
Of the solutions that say what they run on, the share naming each family. By when it went live where the builder told us, otherwise when it was added here. A solution naming two families counts in both, so a row can add up to more than 100%.