Top AI builders for Product & Engineering in Consumer Goods & CPG
Builders never pay to be listed, and order never depends on fees. What counts
On this page: Rankings · New this month · By model
Rankings
Top builders
- 1BOI (Board of Innovation)Top use case: Demand forecast from spreadsheets and instinct3solutions
- 2Loft DesignTop use case: Product & Engineering1solution
- 3Lazer TechnologiesTop use case: Engineering throughput capped by hands-on-keyboard hours1solution
- 4Queen of SwordsTop use case: Validation and prototyping that takes months before a real user sees it1solution
Ranked by solutions on file. Ties go to the builder with more complete receipts: ones that say what changed in numbers, how long it took and what it cost. Once enough receipts are complete, this board will rank by those instead.
Buyers' picks
- 1A Global Wellness Brand Lifted PR Velocity 40% in 6 WeeksLazer Technologies
- 2How a CPG Innovator Compressed NPD From Months to DaysBOI (Board of Innovation)
- 3How Zola Validated a Wedding Product for $40KQueen of Swords
- 4
- 5Nestlé forecasts consumer flavor preferences a decade aheadBOI (Board of Innovation)
- 6Ontex cuts product feasibility checks from weeks to minutesBOI (Board of Innovation)
Likes from buyers count first. Until more solutions have likes, the rest of the list is the receipts that tell a buyer the most: outcomes, a number, a time and a cost.
New this month
By model
Pick a model to see who builds on it and what for.
18 solutions use several models; 18 run on custom or proprietary models. A solution counts once for each family it names. GPT includes OpenAI, ChatGPT and Azure OpenAI; Gemini includes NotebookLM; Open-weight is Llama, Mistral and other self-hosted models.
Most solutions on any model
- 1ModernEdge AITop use case: Repeat customer questions that eat support capacity15solutions
- 2CorralDataTop use case: Marketing spend optimized on the wrong signal10solutions
- 3ElizaTop use case: Engineering throughput capped by hands-on-keyboard hours9solutions
- 4OdeTop use case: Intake documents retyped into a system9solutions
- 5PressWTop use case: Policies exist but nobody can find them mid-task9solutions
- 6Lazer TechnologiesTop use case: Validation and prototyping that takes months before a real user sees it8solutions
- 7Bolt GroupTop use case: Staff or capacity scheduled without visibility into volume6solutions
- 8North GroupTop use case: AI tools in place but unconfigured for the work6solutions
What it's used for
- 116solutions
- 215solutions
- 312solutions
- 411solutions
- 510solutions
- 610solutions
Share of new solutions, by quarter
| Quarter | GPT | Claude | Gemini | Other | Open-weight | Solutions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q2 | 61% | 40% | 12% | 7% | 1% | 92 |
| 2026 Q3 | 43% | 44% | 12% | 9% | 5% | 104 |
| 2026 Q4 | 25% | 75% | 17% | 21% | 8% | 24 |
Of the solutions that say what they run on, the share naming each family. By when it went live where the builder told us, otherwise when it was added here. A solution naming two families counts in both, so a row can add up to more than 100%.