ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 4036
What sucked

In this business, the first supplier to respond usually wins the order, so the owner's hard rule was that no order or inquiry should ever sit longer than 30 minutes without a reply.

In reality his sales team blew past that window constantly, and orders were quietly leaking to faster competitors. He could feel the lost revenue but had no way to see where or why it was happening.

Manufacturing & IndustrialSales & Revenue4–8 weeks
What they built

OutcomeCatalyst layered Claude over a vectorized corpus of 200K+ multilingual emails and the manufacturer's inbound order flow to triage and prioritize every order and inquiry, score urgency, and surface clients at risk of churning. A real-time dashboard shows what's waiting, who owns it, and how fast the team is responding, with alerts before anything crosses the owner's 30-minute line.

What changed
30% of leaking revenue recovered

Closing the response-time gap stopped roughly 30% of the revenue that had been leaking to slow replies, a direct top-line recovery, not a soft efficiency gain.

Sub-30-minute response enforced

Every order and inquiry now tracked in real time with ownership and alerts before it goes cold.

Visibility into response speed

The owner can now see response speed across the team and enforce his own standard, where before he could only sense the lost revenue.

Time to results
4–8 weeks
Company size
51-250 people
Project cost
Under $25K
More fixes like this
Who did it
Zach Shapiro
OutcomeCatalyst

Vetted by Pluris.