ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 6426
What sucked

A precision longevity institute targeting high-net-worth patients faced a constraint that broke every conventional AI architecture: a national data-residency law forbids sending patient data outside the country's infrastructure.

That ruled out every hosted foundation-model API on the market. An incumbent vendor had already burned 12 months on the problem and produced no code or artifacts the institute's team could build on. With a clinic launch date fixed, the institute needed clinical-grade AI that regulators, clinicians, and compliance officers could all sign off on.

Healthcare & Life SciencesProduct & Engineering
What they built

Lazer replaced the incumbent vendor and built three production AI products on a shared platform, an in-clinic biomarker display, a clinician authoring CMS, and a patient mobile app, all wired to a 24-endpoint FHIR R4 engine, with a self-hosted 70B clinical LLM orchestrated through LangGraph and a per-patient care-team chat.

What changed
Zero Data Egress, Hundreds of Controls Satisfied

No patient data leaves in-country infrastructure, and the platform satisfies hundreds of national healthcare security controls, turning the region's hardest regulatory constraint into a deployable architecture.

3 Production AI Products on One Platform

An in-clinic display experience, a clinician authoring CMS, and a patient mobile app all ship from a shared FHIR R4 engine, where the prior vendor's 12-month effort produced nothing usable.

212 Backend Tests, Multiple Security Gaps Closed

Lazer hardened the platform for clinical launch with extensive automated testing and security remediation, with clinician takeover and full audit on every AI interaction.

More fixes like this
Who did it
Aanikh Kler
Lazer Technologies

Vetted by Pluris.