ai receipts
Search your own problem
From the firm's own write-upReceipt no. 3825
What sucked

The School of Psychology had no domain-specific AI training tailored to research methods, and no shared verification culture.

Its 31 academics either over-trusted AI or avoided it, using it as a search/generation tool rather than integrating it into research workflows, with inconsistent adoption across the faculty.

Education & EdTechAI Adoption & Training4–8 weeks
What they built

Real Minds AI delivered eight 4-hour hands-on workshops (32 hours, ~180 person-hours) built around a methodology-first ResearchOps Loop: Ingest, Structure, Transform, Verify, Ship. Sessions used real psychology datasets and transparently demonstrated AI failure modes such as citation errors and emotion sanitisation, reframing AI as an error-checkable colleague.

What changed
195%+ Year 1 ROI

Conservative first-year return on the engagement fee.

8 months to 20 minutes

A data-extraction coding task that previously took nearly a year was completed in 20 minutes.

Zero errors on 500 papers

A 500-paper screening ran with zero errors across 200 spot-checked papers, alongside 200+ pages of reusable materials.

Time to results
4–8 weeks
Company size
5,001+ people
Project cost
Under $25K
Who did it
Tracy Anthony
Real Minds

Pulled from work they published. Pluris hasn't reviewed it yet.