ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 2737
What sucked

UserTesting, a market-leading enterprise SaaS company, feared being disrupted by AI-native startups capable of matching their product at a fraction of the cost.

Productivity was constrained by legacy workflows, and attempts to adopt AI tools were blocked by undeclared concerns from legal, security, and privacy teams, leaving the organization paralyzed before any meaningful change could begin.

Technology & SoftwareAI Adoption & Training6–12 months
What they built

Kaj Van De Loo led a structured company-wide AI adoption program beginning with deliberate pre-alignment of legal, security, and privacy teams as advisors rather than gatekeepers, then rolling out enterprise ChatGPT licenses, custom GPTs integrated with internal data sources, an AI council, and employee-led hackathons.

What changed
Compliance Reframed as Enablement

By repositioning legal, security, and privacy teams as advisors rather than approvers, the program removed the most common organizational blocker to AI adoption, allowing the initiative to move forward quickly and without internal friction.

Employee-Driven AI Innovation at Scale

Custom GPTs built bottom-up by employees, including one built by the CEO to generate personalized customer stories, became widely adopted. One use case automated a professional services intake process that had caused repeated friction between sales and delivery teams.

Organization Ready for AI at Scale

The program left UserTesting with the habits, infrastructure (data-connected custom GPTs), and cultural readiness to accelerate AI adoption continuously, including a clear path toward customer-facing AI self-service.

Time to results
6–12 months
Company size
1,001-5,000 people
Who did it
Kaj Van De Loo
AI Strategy Advisor / Former CPTO, CA1 Team LLC

Vetted by Pluris.