ai receipts
Search your own problem
From the firm's own write-upReceipt no. 2390
What sucked

AI had been effectively banned inside the company: in a sector with no margin for error, security, compliance, and organizational-trust concerns outweighed the perceived benefit.

Teams stayed on slow manual workflows for legislative research and content creation.

Government & Public SectorAI Adoption & Training2–4 months
What they built

Malleable AI defined a responsible-AI framework for an election technology company: a secure build-vs-buy roadmap, compliant tools on secure LLMs with on-premise hosting, and change management and training for staff.

What changed
80% adoption

Staff adoption within the first quarter

25% faster

Reduction in legislative-research and PRD-drafting time

0 breaches

Zero compliance breaches during implementation

Time to results
2–4 months
Who did it
Brian Coombs
Co-founder, Malleable AI

Pulled from work they published. Pluris hasn't reviewed it yet.