ai receipts
Search your own problem
From the firm's own write-upReceipt no. 3413
What sucked

HKS's static planning documents took ~5 months to produce and were often outdated by delivery in a fast-changing downtown.

Conventional tools (Autodesk, GeoBIM) were too complex, good for demos but struggled on real, large-scale projects.

Construction & EngineeringOperations
What they built

HKS used Giraffe, a geospatial modeling tool for urban planning, to craft, refine, and present evolving scenarios in one place for a 900-acre neighborhood study. Key features: geospatial accuracy, iterative modeling of land use and program distribution, real-time built-in metrics (areas, heights, capacities), and interactive web-hosted deliverables replacing static PDFs. Methodology reused on Buford Highway, Santa Cruz, and Auckland Stadium projects.

What changed
4 months → 3 weeks

Scenario work that once took ~four months could be done in as little as three weeks.

5 min vs. 2 weeks

Team reported doing in ~five minutes what would normally take up to two weeks with traditional methods.

Live deliverable

Client received a dynamic, web-hosted model instead of a timestamped PDF, changing how stakeholders engaged with the plan.

More fixes like this
Who did it
James Blackwood
Giraffe

Pulled from work they published. Pluris hasn't reviewed it yet.