ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 9843
What sucked

A large-scale fintech/proptech platform processing hundreds of document applications a day flagged a large share for human review.

Manual verification consumed reviewer time, and existing tools produced high false-positive rates that drove unnecessary escalations, all without the option to add headcount.

Financial ServicesOperations2–4 months
What they built

An interpretable ML fraud-detection system for document verification, a Pass/Fail/Caution classifier on 65+ engineered features, with a plain-English 'AI Assist' explanation layer and a feedback-driven retraining pipeline.

What changed
99% Precision

In production fraud detection.

1.2% False-Positive Rate

Roughly 10x better than the LLM and baseline tools benchmarked.

~50% Less Manual Review

Escalation workload roughly halved.

Time to results
2–4 months
More fixes like this
Who did it
Jay Singh
CEO & Founder, Casper Studios

Vetted by Pluris.