From the firm's own write-upReceipt no. 6349
What sucked
The organization had to demonstrate outcomes to funders while upholding strict privacy commitments to the people it serves.
Its data was scattered across many systems owned by different teams, with no unified governance framework, and prior advice had carried unaffordable seven-figure price tags.
What they built
Crawford McMillan built a governance framework grounded in the organization's existing privacy commitments, alongside an architecture for a centralized analytics layer that supports aggregate reporting without exposing individual records, including selecting and implementing a governance platform.
What changed
Report + protect
Aggregate outcome reporting without exposing individual records
Shared governance
Governance framework grounded in existing privacy commitments
Board assurance
Documented safeguards give boards and donors confidence
More fixes like this
- How a Custom Manufacturer Reclaimed $500K of Exec TimeStalliant · Manufacturing & Industrial
- How a Mid-Market CFO Halved Board Reporting TimeEventus Advisory Group · Financial Services
- How One Manufacturer Cut Diligence Waits 80% With AIScaylor · Manufacturing & Industrial
- How A Preschool Operator Lifted Labor Productivity 50%SaxeCap · Education & EdTech