ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 7212
What sucked

Axia Partners underwrites RV park and outdoor hospitality acquisitions, and a full comparable analysis took 80 analyst hours per park, roughly three weeks of elapsed time.

At the firm's acquisition pace that math stopped working, and Axia had planned to hire two analysts purely to keep comps ahead of the pipeline. Separately, a portfolio-wide comp refresh across every park took 21 days, so in practice it rarely got run.

Real EstateInvesting & Deals2–4 months
What they built

SageCreek built a comp analysis agent on Claude Opus 4.6 that collects booking and occupancy data through purpose-built browser automation, runs the analytical steps Axia's analysts ran by hand, and writes the comp study. A park comp comes back the same day instead of taking 80 analyst hours, and the full portfolio refreshes overnight for roughly $200 a month.

What changed
80 hrs → same day

of analyst work per park comp, now returned the same day

~2x the comps

found versus the same market worked by hand, with none missed

2 analyst hires

called off; the 21-day portfolio refresh now runs overnight

Time to results
2–4 months
Company size
1-50 people
More fixes like this
Who did it
Connor McLeod
Partner, Sagecreek.ai

Vetted by Pluris.