ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 8416
What sucked

Reynolds Consumer Products wanted a stronger pipeline of meaningful, consumer-led innovation, but its research was fragmented across consumer studies, market reports, product reviews, social conversations, sales data and internal strategic priorities.

The problem was not a shortage of information. It was knowing which signals mattered, how they connected, and where Reynolds had credible room to grow beyond its familiar product categories as consumers' cooking and household habits changed.

Consumer Goods & CPGExecutive & Strategy4–8 weeks
What they built

Starday ran its proprietary AI research and decision system over Reynolds' internal research and performance data plus roughly 174,000 product reviews, 50,000+ social posts, segmentation, category research and competitive intelligence, then its innovation team turned the evidence into growth territories and product concepts.

What changed
45% of pipeline ideas came from this work

Only 10 to 15% overlap with concepts from another strategy partner

40% expansion of the innovation pipeline

More ideas in Reynolds' pipeline, and a more differentiated set to advance

A broader strategic growth platform

The CEO took up the full cooking journey as territory, helping shape an "Own the Kitchen" direction

Time to results
4–8 weeks
Company size
5,001+ people
Project cost
$250K – $500K
More fixes like this
Who did it
Chaz Flexman
CEO & Co-Founder, Starday Foods

Vetted by Pluris.