ai receipts
Search your own problem
Case study · From the Pluris libraryReceipt no. 1846
What sucked

The venture studio of a major North American pension plan (hundreds of billions in assets under management) was evaluating an insurance-focused venture whose viability hinged on one technical question: can AI reliably extract structured data from the industry's messiest documents?

Statement-of-value files, sprawling Excel sheets, and OCR-heavy PDFs had to be parsed and understood before the studio could justify committing capital to a full build. The studio rarely outsources development, making this a targeted feasibility bet with a hard decision point at the end.

InsuranceOperations4–8 weeks
What they built

Lazer built a six-week feasibility pilot that tested AI models, processes, and libraries against real insurance documents. Anthropic's Claude was selected as the parsing engine within a swappable-model framework, running on a Python and Temporal pipeline on AWS, with Weights & Biases evaluations validating accuracy throughout.

What changed
80% Model Accuracy on Insurance OCR

The pipeline hit 80% accuracy on the OCR-heavy documents where table-transformer approaches had failed completely, the number that made the venture decision concrete.

6 Weeks From Question to Demo-Ready Prototype

Three weeks of disciplined AI R&D plus three weeks of engineering produced a working pipeline the studio could demo to prospective customers.

Venture Investment De-Risked

The studio got its feasibility answer with evidence, plus a model-swappable framework that would not need rebuilding as the AI landscape shifted.

Time to results
4–8 weeks
Company size
5,001+ people
More fixes like this
Who did it
Aanikh Kler
Lazer Technologies

Vetted by Pluris.